Mens Suit Sizes. The information in the table below provides a method of converting suit sizes between the U.S. sizes, European sizes and the U.K. Figures are given for mens suits.

However, the foot size which goes along with this scale seems way out. Download and print out Shoe Sizing charts. With all due respect, I have never used "wiggle room" calculations to adjust for shoe size, and I imagine most people have never required it either.

The Euro (EUR) is the currency of 22 European countries, including 17 countries in the European Union. This comparison focuses on the history and evolution, central banking, amount of money in circulation and the exchange rate between these two currencies.
International shirt, pants and dress size conversion chart – USA & Canada, UK, Europe, Japan and Australia clothing sizes. – E.g. a US sized 2 shirt is equivalent to a European sized 32 shirt.
European shoe size 42 is American Men shoe size 8 1/2 and American Women shoe size
Men's Clothing Size Conversions Clothing sizes in the United States are different than those found in most other countries. If you are a visitor from another country shopping for clothes in the USA, it might be useful to know the differences in US sizes.
In addition to the US shoe size version, Brannock Devices are also available in Centimeter, European, Mondo, and UK, most with a junior version. Presumably, there will be different formulas for the size plans that don't use a size verbatim (Centimeter vs Euro).
Shoe Size and Clothing Size Charts

But First, A Really Great Video on How to Take Body Measurements

The Euro (EUR) is the currency of 22 European countries, including 17 countries in the European Union. This comparison focuses on the history and evolution, central banking, amount of money in circulation and the exchange rate between these two currencies.

A shoe should be about one size larger then the foot it surrounds, so the measuring stick would be marked with a child's size one one hand and a third of an inch, rather than the round number of one hand or four inches exactly. This "starting roughly" was altered at some point by colonists in the USA - of which more below.

The system measures foot length and is unisex, but womens' shoes tend to be narrower at the heel than mens'. A man wearing women's shoes would be well advised to try a few pairs on first transvestite mail-order is a difficult business as court shoes are traditionally worn tight and likewise a woman wearing a boy's shoe might find it more comfortable with a couple of pads glued-in to the sides.

For some loose-fitting styles, unisex designs are possible and work well. I don't understand the internal logic of the american system, but it may be related to the different foot widths that people of different nationalities have: It may also be that the first mass-production of shoes coincided with a great increase in gender differences; that it was inconceivable to the suppliers that a man would wear a womens' shoe or vica versa. Whatever the cause, people in the USA ended-up with two length measurements - one for women, one for men, and neither the same as the unisex starting point in the UK.

If anyone would like to help me clarify the different systems better - particularly by adding logic to the size systems to make them memorable, please get in touch. Suzanne writes " In Australia, women's shoes have been 2 sizes higher than the men's shoe for shoes of equal length for at least the last 30 years my lifetime. My mother says they changed sometime in the 60s or 70s. So a man's size 5 is the same length as a woman's size 7. I have never seen shoes sold in a retail environment that weren't sized this way, with the exception of Doc marten's, which of course are a British sized shoe.

European countries use a metric system. Because the centimetre is larger than the difference you would want between two sizes of shoe, the system is to use two thirds of a centre metre. Use our perfect-fit jeans calculator to convert any waist size to the corresponding US standard jeans size. In this jeans size conversion chart, you will find an overview of jeans sizes for men and boys.

You can measure them and determine the size, or you can easily check which jeans size corresponds to your clothing size. The different types of jeans: In this chart, you will find an overview of jeans sizes for women and girls. Jeans are divided between High-Waisted-Rise to Low-Rise jeans, depending on how high the jeans are worn. Each pants size that is labeled in inches includes these two figures. The number 32 then corresponds to a leg length of 32 inches. Before measuring your pants, take a pair of jeans and place them flat on the floor.

Fasten the front button before measuring. To calculate the width of your waistband, measure the upper corner of the waistband from left to right. For leg length, the inner jeans length from the stride length to the lower corner of the jeans is measured, i. Enter the results into the jeans calculator.

If you enter the body measurements into the jeans size calculator, you will get the measurement in inches. These are, of course, only indicative values. This can considerably affect the fit of the jeans and shows that body measurements are only indications. In order to get as realistic a guideline as possible, the measurement should always be taken with jeans that fit. Trying the jeans on is, however, unavoidable if it is to fit really well in the end.

You will soon learn why. That's ridiculous - its 10 times too large or conversely, a size 45 would be for someone with feet 3cm long! Also this is inconsistent with the UK sizes. Converting EU size 45 via the formulas given gives a UK size So either the formulae are wrong, or the measurement used in the two cases is different, they can't both come from the size of the last. The section on French sizes is plain wrong: The statement that a full 2 centimeters has to be added to foot length is wrong.

Also see the counterpart in the French wiki which I have created a link to. The formula then stacks error on error because it does not reflect the text. I will correct the formula to reflect the text.

If the "add 2cm claim is not substantiated I will correct text and formula in a few weeks to reflect the contents on the French!

When editing shoe-size formulas, please stick to the notational conventions defined in ISO that are today universally used not only in the physical sciences and technology all around the world.

A "last length" or "foot length" is just a physical quantity , that is the product of a unit length multiplied by the number of units. On the other hand, a "shoe size" label is a quantity of dimension 1, meaning it has no unit, something you get by dividing two lengths. Please do not write "last length in millimeters" or the like. We can assume that people know perfectly well how to add two lengths even if they were stated in different units originally i.

This way, it is unimportant in which unit the "last length" was measured. It is just a physical length, not any particular number of units. Considering the inaccuracies that have been reported on a few occasions, what should we do with this information?

It would be good if we could find a UK-based expert on the subject to rewrite this section. Sometime since the last pair of shoes that I bought, the shoe industry in the USA has gone berserk. The article doesn't mention this catastrophe, nor does it appear to describe the new width scale.

Several popular shoe manufacturers don't even offer options for width any more, disenfranchising anyone with an even moderately unusual foot shape. If you can even find shoes in, say, narrow sizes, you may be left with an extremely limited number of available styles, and those that are available may only be available with a single color choice etc. It would be nice to see the article acknowledge the issue. What is the conversion between the old A, B, C I wish to think about the Russian shoe sizes.

Could have differences between Russian and EU shoe sizes? Allo talk , 24 October Where to find Middle Eastern Arabic shoe sizes? Is it equal to European ones? Allo Talk , January Australian men's shoe-sizes are founded on the UK model; they should be the same. The formulas for Australian sizes - Simon the Likable talk From my experience selling shoes, convention in Australia is to use US rather than UK sizing conventions, with some European shoes Birkenstocks, MBT's etc using the European sizing that their manufacturers use.

Somebody who's up on the preferred formatting techniques could link to that in the article or incorporate the numbers into the table. Would it be better to dispense with the math template where formula can be represented with standard text? Not necessarily saying we should, just asking.

Ten inches is millimeters. And the "source" linked to by the chart is defunct, so there is no easy way to correct the errors and recreate it.

The page is an unorganized collection of facts, many without references. I wouldn't know where to begin. I went to the https: There are more errors in the shoe size chart: European Size 42 refers to shoe length of 28 cm, in the chart it's 28,5 cm. Information might be found in handbooks for the American shoe industry or similar literature hardly available in Germany. I could not find the FIA recommendations mentioned in the article. However, technically I do not know how to change the chart. Maybe someone else does?

The user who created the chart seems to be inactive. UK mens size 6 or EU size 39 is It would be good if, wherever the article refers to a formula or mathematical expression to indicate shoe sizes, there were an example indicating how the formula ought to be used.

A much better way forward is to avoid formulae entirely and focus upon the use of tables. In particular, tables that have columns indicating cm length and inches length and how these lengths should be converted into shoe size. With all due respect, I have never used "wiggle room" calculations to adjust for shoe size, and I imagine most people have never required it either.

I will endeavour to make some of the changes I indicate above, but don't expect anything anytime soon. I use this section all the time as it is the only reliable chart on the Internet, it was working just a few days ago, but the tables no longer display. I have tried this on two computers using different browsers Firefox and Google Chrome.

The linked charts display this message: This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. Also, the article doesn't mention Eastern Europe at all. What do they use, too? I'd like an exact answer, not just a guess. I have previously lived in Estonia, Poland, Serbia and Slovenia and can confirm that they use the standard European sizes I'm British and take a size Eastern Europe generally follows this system this is just a guess but it is based on the above experiences which are in countries with very different histories so I'd expect neighbouring countries to be the same.

Scandinavia, or at least Sweden, Finland and Estonia, is also the same in my experience. It would appear that only the UK and Ireland Malta, maybe? A pet peeve of mine has become that most U. A few years ago, I could find "C" and various numbers of "E" or "M" and "W" widths in local shoe stores.

Some would advertise proudly "we have extra-wide widths". Have feet increased in width since the presumable original A B C D E system was devised, or have the specifications drifted?

My own feet stubbornly remain "B" width in defiance of the new trend. Puddik at talk The text in the American Customary and British section seems to contradict itself. It states that the US size is given by 3 X last length , so a last length of 10 in would mean size 6.

But it also states that the US size is numerically 1 greater than the British size, and that size according to the British section is 3 X last length - 22, so a last length of 12 would mean size 8. It is not true that 6 is 1 greater than 8. This sort of self-contradiction renders the page valueless; unfortunately there is a risk that people will not notice the self contradictions in the page and trust some part of it which is wrong.

If I had reliable information, I might attempt to fix this problem, but I don't and I would probably make it worse not better.

I hope than someone who understands the topic and has access to reliable information will take it in hand. The information and formulae converning UK sizes, European sizes and Brannock sizes are now fully correct and based on solid, albeit German literatuere, see the German wikipedia.

Solid information on US customary and FIA sizes is missing and highy desirable, the informations given in the article may be wrong. The tables are in part incorrect and contradict the text, but I do not know, how to change them. These charts are all a joke, especially the "Complete" conversion chart, which leaves out sizes beyond 13US.

I have a size 15 US and am trying to find the conversions so I broaden my shopping range to other countries, but no, this seems impossible. You can find anything on the internet, anything except a decent shoe size conversion chart or calculator.

Shop by category

Here are some very useful size conversion charts for US, UK, and EURO SIZE CONVERSION CHART WOMEN'S Dresses & suits European 34 36 38 40 42 For those who are not familiar with either the US shoe size chart or the European shoe size chart, we offer a US to European shoe size conversion chart and European to US shoe size conversion chart. Shoe Lengths for U.S. & European Shoe Sizes with Sizing Chart, U.S. to European Shoe Size Conversion Chart, Shoe Fitting Guide. The more expensive the store, the greater likelihood of English fluency. For sizes that depend on measurements, remember that one inch is equal to centimeters (although 2 .